Thursday, December 28, 2006

Get Me Gold!

From Money and Markets

It’s been a wild year in the markets, and if recent events are any barometer, 2007 is going to be even crazier.

Right off the bat, let me reaffirm my most important point: Gold is going to be the asset to own in 2007.

The yellow metal posted an impressive return in 2006 — almost 22% for spot gold through yesterday. But I consider that move to be just the prelude to much higher levels.

Indeed, gold’s action so far is just an indicator of things to come ... rising inflation ... a falling dollar ... and insurmountable debts in Washington.

More on that in a moment. First, let me take you back in time ...

How Gold and the Dollar
Got Irrevocably Separated

It’s 1947 at the London office on St. Swithin’s Lane. Inside are six members of the London Gold Committee. A bullion expert from N. M. Rothschild & Sons says, “Gentlemen, it is eleven o’clock. We begin.”

Each member immediately calls his office on a special direct telephone line to determine how much gold is available for sale and how much is bid for.

All heck is breaking loose because there’s not enough gold for sale to meet demand. Reason: Investors around the world have been jittery for weeks. They’ve been watching the U.S.’s financial position deteriorate.

In fact, America’s balance sheet is in such terrible shape that Treasury Secretary John Snyder has been forced to announce new bond offerings to help cover the worst budget deficit in U.S. history ($45 billion of red ink), not to mention the national debt of $247 billion.

The official price of gold is $35 an ounce and climbing. It seems like everyone wants the metal. Investors are worried about the lingering costs of World War II. They’re worried that the value of the U.S. dollar will plummet in the international currency markets. So they’re hanging onto the gold they have, making the market even tighter.

Over the next several months, the buying pressure mounts, driving gold’s price up to $43.25, a gain of 23.5%. There are frequent rumors that the U.S. Treasury’s stockpiles of gold are dwindling. The squeeze is on!

The bull market in gold lasts until 1951, when Washington announces the so-called Treasury-Federal Reserve Accord. It stipulates that the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve will act separately with respect to “dollar policy” and “monetary policy.” The agreement effectively begins the process of cutting the link between the dollar and gold.

Twenty years later, the prior accord on currencies — the Bretton Woods Agreement — is dismantled. Then, in 1973, all ties to gold are officially cut by President Richard Nixon.

The moral of the story — authorities will always opt for a weaker currency when they smell financial trouble. And boy is there trouble now ...

Three Major Financial
Threats to Your Wealth

Inflation is running rampant: You can see inflation in nearly every major asset — stocks, bonds, and commodities. You can see it in the plunging dollar, an undeniable signal that inflation is bursting at the seams. And you can see it every time you go to the grocery store, buy clothes, or pay for gas.

Washington and Wall Street keep trying to convince us that inflation is “benign.” But don’t believe them or their manipulated Consumer Price Index (CPI), which leaves a number of everyday living expenses and fudges many other prices.

The Federal Reserve no longer controls interest rates: Twenty years ago, the Fed had some real say regarding interest rates. But these days, the overwhelming pile-up of debts has changed everything. The U.S. government and other federal agencies owe trillions and trillions of dollars to the rest of the world.

These are huge debts in large, difficult-to-control markets. Add it all up, and you’ll see that the markets control interest rates — not the Fed. The Fed’s rate decisions merely mimic market rates, rubber stamping them time after time.

The dollar is weak in the knees: The dollar’s major trend since early 2002 has been relentlessly down. And there’s nothing on the economic horizon right now to change that direction. In short, I don’t expect the dollar’s pain to stop anytime soon.

What does all this mean?

Why Gold Is Poised to
Rocket Much Higher

For centuries, gold has maintained a basically stable value in terms of purchasing power. That’s why investors pile into the yellow metal whenever other markets look shaky.

Gold is real money. Unlike stocks or bonds, gold has no debts, no earnings, no boards of directors, no funny accounting statements, and no obligations to anyone but itself.

Gold is the purest investment in the world. While paper money can be printed or devalued at will, the same cannot be said for gold.

Of course, there isn’t much gold to go around. All the gold ever mined in the history of the world (about 151,000 metric tons) can fit into a cube measuring only 62.3 feet on each side. And gold production is declining despite today’s elevated prices.

Just one example: Over the last ten years, gold production in South Africa has plummeted 50%!

So, the way I see it, plunging production, rising demand, surging inflation, and a lack of investor confidence in the U.S. dollar all add up to one thing — much higher gold prices to come.

I don’t know if gold will blast off to new highs today, tomorrow, or next month. But I can tell you this: You’re probably looking at the last chance to buy gold in the $600 range. A few months from now, we could easily be staring at $750 gold.

And that will just be the start. Everything indicates the yellow metal is in a long-term bull market and headed much higher. In terms of the purchasing power of today’s dollars, gold reached $2,176 in 1980. But right now, it’s trading a fraction of this inflation-adjusted high.

Even if gold got halfway to its inflation-adjusted price, it would zoom to more than $1,000 an ounce, a huge gain from current levels.

That’s why, for me, gold is absolutely the asset to own in 2007.

Here are four ways to get your stake in the yellow metal ...

First, you can buy bullion. For small amounts, a convenient vehicle is 1-ounce and 10-ounce gold ingots. It might be a good idea to own some physical gold this way, but don’t go overboard. It’s too much of a pain in the neck to transport and store it.

Second, use the streetTRACKS Gold Shares (GLD) exchange-traded fund. Each share represents 1/10 of an ounce of pure gold. And all the costs of storing and insuring the metal are covered for you.

Third, consider gold mutual funds like DWS Gold & Precious Metals Fund (SCGDX) and Tocqueville Gold (TGLDX). You can pack them away, with a view toward holding them for at least a couple years. In my view, these funds could double, triple, even quadruple, over that timeframe.

Fourth, you can invest in individual gold stocks. But be careful here. The irony of today’s bull market in gold is that some gold mining companies may actually go out of business as the price of gold soars. Reason: They still hedge too much of their gold production and/or reserves.

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Quote of the Day
Quoting the NAR "The Voice for Real Estate " as proof of the strength of real estate is the equivalent of asking the guy in the red suit and white beard at the shopping mall during Christmas season if he believes in Santa Claus. Of course he will say he believes in Santa Claus.

- Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Monday, December 25, 2006

The "Real" Price of Silver

Is this what unmanipulated, unhedged, solely market-driven silver actually looks like?


Of course from a fundamental perspective our undeniable bullish attitude on hard assets, notably precious metals and gold and silver in particular is unchanged and will stay that way for the next 8 to 10 years. The ups and down will come and go but in the long run we strongly believe that commodities is the place to be for the decade, of which gold and silver are the easiest and most secure to own. For a complete rundown on the fundamentals Click Here.

Looking at the current Technical factors however, there seems to be an underlying trend in silver. If you'll look at the chart below you will notice how silver bulls begin to buy. Then institutional investors and larger speculators jump in almost sending the metal into a huge speculative bubble. Overbought it then retreats closer to its "comfort" range, only to then rise again this time with a bit less speculation. It will then dip below its new "comfort range" equalizing to create what is the new "comfort zone" or standard price for silver.


The reasoning behind these actions will be most understood based on the sentiment that drives them. Initially, there is the fundamental argument that cash is trash and that stocks will underpreform their averages over the next few years. Similar to the way they did in the late early 70s. These buyers of the metal buy solely for the sake of a safe haven, not necessarily for a profit or for "better returns".

The second more explosive upleg, comes from a more speculative approach that of large investors who feel that silver will outperform other commodities or equities. This boom soon fizzles overselling into a sub-normal price range. This was seen in both 2004 and 2006. In these instances the metal can lose as much as 30% of its value. This is then followed by an equalizing of the price. Industrial users, such as jewelers, must recuperate from the parabola and begin to rationalize with higher silver prices. This is usually done through a smaller boom and bust of much lesser measure - 20% up and down. The new price of silver has now been established. This is when again the fundamental investors return to drive the metal up more conservatively until the big boys catch on.

We are currently in a consolidation stage. After 2004, investors went from a standard $5 an ounce to $7. Chances are that we will end up with a more stable price around the 12.50 mark. The final price is usually established after the market-wide fluctuations and will usually settle between the two extremes - 12.50 in our case. Thus it was no surprise to see silver trading on the market - without the help of larger market speculators - selling at this range since it is, at least for now, the proper market price for silver.

If history is our guide, then we are likely to see this many times over the next few years. Assuming the last two figures, we would reckon that silver prices will consolidate to a solid 12.50 fluctuating only a few points within that range. We will then see a spike of maybe 100% - driving the metal to $24 an ounce, followed by the 30% bust - $16. The markets would then begin their consolidation closing in on a final silver price of $20-21 an ounce.

Do realize that this is all a technical chart and indicators bringing along a technical speculation. Of course the irrational of markets along with the fundamentals behind the secular commodities bull may distort these figures sometimes entirely.

We suggest that if you are interested in speculating, it be done with only extra reserves of your holdings. In regard to shorting silver especially in a bull market, I would highly consider doing so on a very minute basis and on zero or very low margin. The fundamentals behind the run, sudden covering from heavy short positions forced to buy back, geopolitical tensions or a heavy slide in the dollar due to Central Banks could all send silver into a frenzy stage of irrational buying and selling far superseding the mere technical trends.

So on a fundamental basis we recommend buying silver for anything under $18 and on any major dips. Anything below $12.50 regardless of the situation is a string buying opportunity.
Why Gold?

I've been getting this question quite often. Here are a few of the fundamentals that will drive this bull market. Once again. Bull and Bear Markets aren't timing predictions. They are the inevitable traits of a healthy market. Projection and correction. Expansion and recession. The longer you extend one the longer you are extending the other. These are things an investor must live with. It is the traders who attempt to make money predicting the various stages in a run or a retreat.

This article may be quite lengthy, but worth it.

Gold Fundamentals
by Adam Hamilton

In this frenetic world of ours, we spend most of our time trapped under the tyranny of the present. The urgent preempts the important and life is a mad dash from one activity to the next with little opportunity for reflection. But in this season when one year is yielding to the next, all of a sudden the past and future return to focus.

When year-end and a new year force us to briefly emerge from the haze of the present to survey the big picture, a precious opportunity arises. When we briefly regain strategic perspective over our lives, we are blessed with a chance to ponder our past and steer towards the most desirable future. This impetus is very strong in the realm of finance and portfolio design.

Often the busiest months of the financial-market year are December and January. As the urgency of the present temporarily fades and the past and future return to focus, many important investment decisions are made. As you consider your own investment portfolio and whether it is prudent to add or remove positions, I urge you to consider gold.

Gold belongs in every investment portfolio, regardless of an investor's age, goals, and risk tolerance. It is an anchor of indisputable, timeless, and universal intrinsic value in a dangerous financial world where any paper-asset prices can plummet overnight. If you don't own gold, or your gold position is too small relative to your portfolio size, then you are not truly diversified and you are accepting much more overall risk than you need to.

I've been a gold investor for many years now, and have ridden our current gold bull in my own investments and speculations since it launched. On the very trading day before gold carved its multi-decade secular bottom in early April 2001 I concluded an essay with, "History, economic fundamentals, and logic dictate gold is amazingly undervalued and due for a monstrous rally. My capital will be ready for the coming gold rush!"

The next day gold briefly fell under $257 but it has never looked back since. As of this past May's $720 high, since 2001 gold's bull has climbed about 182%, really an incredible gain for the safest and most enduring asset in world history. So hundreds of weeks of research and thousands of percents of realized gains later, I am not a newcomer to this gold bull. But I do still meet many folks who are just starting looking into gold as an investment.

It is for these investors kicking the tires of gold that I am penning this essay. The most common questions I hear from these folks are usually variations of the following... Why is gold in a bull market? When will its bull market end? Am I too late to buy gold since it has already risen so far? What are the core fundamental drivers of this gold bull? Will central banks cap the gold price and therefore crush the gold investors?

After endless studies considering these very questions, my own personal worldview for gold still remains very bullish for the long term. Despite how far we have come I still believe we are in the midst of a massive secular (long-term) gold bull that will likely run higher for another decade or so. There will be periodic corrections of course just as in any bull, but on balance gold seems destined to rise for many years to come yet.

To attempt to address some of these key questions for newer gold investors as well as explore the gold fundamentals that make it so bullish, I've broken down the rationale behind this secular-gold-bull thesis into ten broad-overview reasons. If you carefully ponder and digest these, you will understand why gold's fundamentals are so bullish and why every investor's portfolio should have material gold exposure.

1. Supply and Demand. The ultimate arbiter of any price is supply and demand. When demand exceeds supply, prices are forced to rise. These rising prices work to address a chronic deficit simultaneously from both sides, providing an incentive for producers to increase production while also providing a parallel incentive for consumers to decrease consumption. Eventually the rising prices bring supply and demand back into equilibrium where production and consumption are balanced.

In gold's case, its global investment demand is growing much faster than its global mined supply, so the only possible economic resolution for this deficit is higher prices to bring supply and demand back into balance. I'll discuss the reasons why gold's demand is rising below, so for now let's focus on why its mined supply simply cannot rise fast enough to meet demand growth.

Unlike almost every other business, gold mining is totally dependent on highly local geology. Obviously you can't build a gold mine unless there is gold to mine! Since gold is so scarce in the natural world, it is very difficult to find a site with enough gold to mine economically. And even if you manage to find such a site after endless exploration, you are totally at the mercy of local and national governments, all of which are corrupt and love to extort profits from captive mining ventures. Since mines cannot be moved, governments prey on them.

And if you manage to find a suitable gold deposit and can somehow jump through all the flaming bureaucratic hoops, you still have to raise tens or hundreds of millions of dollars to build roads, erect buildings and infrastructure, sink the shaft or pit, and buy the necessary heavy equipment. And even if you beat the odds and manage to secure financing, it still takes several years at best to spin operations up to full speed.

So not only is gold mining an extremely tough business plagued with geological quirks and government harassment and enormous up-front capital costs, but even if you can overcome all of these stellar hurdles you won't be selling any of your gold for years. Thus, no matter how high the gold price travels, it will still literally take years for producers to find new deposits to develop, mine, and sell. There are no shortcuts in this industry.

Global gold mined supply is therefore very inelastic (unresponsive to price) and highly constrained over anything short of a half decade or so. Today's higher gold prices will take at least several years for producers to respond to, but only after these producers believe that this bull will be persistent enough to make a big bet on it. Thus the rate of mined gold supply growth cannot and will not grow very fast in the coming years.

2. Long Valuation Waves. The general stock markets move in great 33-year cycles known as Long Valuation Waves. For the first half of these cycles, like from 1982 to 2000, stock valuations and prices rise in massive bull markets. But in the second half, like from 1966 to 1982 or 2000 to 2016, stock valuations relentlessly mean revert back down below long-term averages. We are in this brutal valuation wave winter today.

Although stocks make horrible long-term investments during the latter half of these Long Valuation Waves, thankfully commodities and hard assets thrive. Commodities also move in roughly one-third-of-a-century cycles over time, but they tend to oscillate 180 degrees out of phase to the equity valuation waves. Thus, secular commodities tops like in the early 1980s coincide with secular equity bottoms. And secular equity tops, like in 2000, coincide with secular commodities bottoms.

Our current Great Commodities Bull launched in 2001, just after the secular top in the general stock markets capping a mighty equity bull lasting for half of a 33-year valuation cycle. Market history is very emphatic in demonstrating that the 17 years after this parallel commodities bottom and equities top should be great for commodities but very poor for equities. Since we are now about 7 years into this usually 17-year trend, this precedent suggests commodities should be strong and equities weak for another decade or so yet.

And indeed on the supply side commodities capital investment was neglected for two decades prior to 2001 so global production remains relatively low while world demand for commodities is skyrocketing, particularly out of rapidly-industrializing Asia. Just as with gold specifically, for commodities in general constrained supply growth accompanied by accelerating global demand guarantees higher prices.

So why languish in a secular stock bear when your investments can thrive in a secular commodities bull? As more and more investors come to realize this, their demand for gold and other commodities-related vehicles will only grow greater and greater. We may as well bet on the horse most likely to win in the next decade!

3. King of Commodities Investments. Out of all the ways to invest in a Great Commodities Bull, gold is the single easiest and safest. Physical gold is easy to buy, requires no upkeep, and a great deal of wealth can be secured and stored in a relatively trivial volume. Unlike many other major commodities, physical gold is not perishable and can be stored indefinitely. Gold has always been the ultimate commodities investment.

For pure investment purposes, every other commodity falls short of gold. You can easily hide $1m in gold coins in an old unused pipe section in your house and no thief would find it in a thousand years. If you buy $1m in wheat though, you will have to purchase land and bins to store it, and insects and humidity could destroy it in less than a year if it isn't stored perfectly. Oil may be the king of commodities in general, but try to get zoning permission to build a giant tank to store $1m worth of crude oil in your backyard!

Silver is ultra-volatile and one of the greatest speculations in history, but it is inferior to gold as a store of wealth. In addition to its brutal gut-checking price volatility, its value-to-volume ratio is vastly lower than gold's. $1m worth of silver weighs far more and takes up a great deal more room than $1m in gold. For investors wanting to deploy capital directly into this secular commodities bull, gold is the most logical choice today just as it always has been.

4. Ultimate Alternative Investment. Some investors will buy gold to ride the commodities bull, while others will buy gold to escape the equities bear. This distinction may seem subtle, but it is very important. Gold is a natural destination for equity flight capital since it is the ultimate alternative investment in world history.

Mainstream financial investments are virtually all intangible paper. All of the stocks and bonds we own, even all of our bank accounts, are ultimately nothing more than someone else's promises to pay. If these promises are not honored, then the stocks and bonds are worth no more than the paper on which they are printed. During the descending half of Long Valuation Waves, after enough years of punishment, investors' confidence in paper assets wanes. Remember the 1970s?

Gold is the ultimate alternative investment because it is tangible. It is a real physical asset that has intrinsic value in and of itself, never dependent on someone else's mere promises to pay. Since gold is fully independent from the paper financial system and its underlying fragile web of promises, it has long been perceived as the most ideal safe haven when investors flee paper.

Unlike paper investments which have brittle foundations of faith alone in some relatively new and fragile institutions, gold's real purchasing power has remained strong for over six millennia. Gold has outlasted every currency, investment, and government that has ever existed. No other investment, alternative or mainstream, has even come close to transcending the ravages of time like gold has. Gold also transcends political boundaries, it is universally valued everywhere on the planet.

Interestingly, as equity flight capital bids up gold prices in the years ahead it will create a virtuous circle that attracts in even more capital. Gold, like all investments, becomes more attractive to more people the higher it goes. This is contrary to normal supply-and-demand profiles, where demand becomes lower at higher prices. In gold's case, investors bidding up its price end up putting it on the radars of even more investors, who bid it up farther and accelerate this bullish cycle.

5. Relentless Fiat Currency Inflation. Speaking of paper, every national currency on the planet today is pure fiat, just paper monopoly-money backed by nothing but faith in the issuing government. Since today's monetary supplies have no roots in reality, governments can and do grow money supplies much faster than the underlying pools of goods and services on which to spend money. The US dollar has not been backed by gold since 1971.

When money supplies grow faster than underlying economies, soon relatively more money is bidding on relatively fewer goods and services. This monetary competition drives up general prices. This increase in money supply is, of course, the scourge of inflation. Inflation is a diabolical and immoral stealth tax imposed by governments on their unsuspecting populaces. People work hard for a lifetime saving money, but when they retire they sadly find that their money will buy a lot less than it did back when they were saving.

As more and more investors perceive the dire threat of systemic inflation to their families' futures, they will naturally migrate into gold. Gold keeps pace with inflation, buying roughly the same amount of real goods and services regardless of currency in circulation. In the 1920s one ounce of gold would buy a good men's business suit at $20. Today this same ounce of gold at $625 will still buy the same grade of suit, but the original $20 in paper won't even buy lunch! Fiat paper currencies are virtually always a terrible long-term investment.

While paper money supplies tend to perpetually grow by 7% to 9% annually in the First World thanks to irresponsible and unaccountable central bankers, the newly mined physical gold supply rarely exceeds 1% a year in growth. This stable and naturally-limited very low growth rate is why gold has been the ultimate form of money for six thousand years now. With fiat currency growth rates far exceeding the gold supply growth rate, it is inevitable that relatively more paper will chase relatively less gold, bidding up its nominal price.

6. Negative Real Rates. A key corollary to fiat inflation is today's brutally low or negative real rate environments, where bond investors either break even or actually lose purchasing power by the mere act of lending out their hard-earned capital. When the rate of underlying true monetary inflation exceeds the nominal interest rates available in the markets, bond investing becomes a losing proposition.

Now please realize I am talking about the true inflation rate here, which is the growth rate in broad money supplies, not the watered-down government-reported inflation numbers. The government aggressively lowballs the CPI by choosing to exclude items rising in price and by using hedonic statistical wizardry. The lower the reported CPI growth, the lower the growth in the government's non-discretionary inflation-indexed welfare-like payments which leaves more discretionary funds for politicians to spend on their pet projects.

Free markets hinge on the crucial concept of mutually beneficial transactions. The bond markets are where savers, who consume less than they earn, meet up with debtors, who earn less than they consume, to consummate capital transactions. True free-market prices for this money, or interest rates, provide a reasonable return to the saver and a reasonable cost to the debtor, a mutually beneficial transaction. Interest rates should always be set by the free markets instead of the unconstitutional abomination known as the Fed.

But with today's artificially low interest rates, it is nearly impossible for bond investors, savers, to get a fair return on their capital. If they can only earn 5% on their capital but true monetary inflation is running 8%, then they actually lose 3% of their purchasing power every year. They are punished for being savers, something central bankers absolutely revel in for reasons that escape me. It is saving that should be encouraged and debt that should be punished if a nation truly wants to experience great prosperity and wealth!

As such, when central banks artificially manipulate interest rates too low, bond investors gradually pull out of the rigged market. Since they can't beat inflation in bonds, they gradually migrate into gold so they can at least maintain their purchasing power. Negative real rate environments are one of the most bullish scenarios imaginable for gold investment demand, since they drive capital out of bonds and into gold.

The Long Valuation Wave winter will drive exasperated equity investors into gold, but the unfair and artificially gutted interest rates will drive fed-up bond investors into gold. It is foolish to allow a central bank to force savers to subsidize wanton debtors. The savers may as well just buy gold to ride out the inflationary storm and say to heck with the debtors trying to rob them blind.

7. Investors Trump Central Banks. One of the most unfortunate attributes of gold investors as a whole is our incessant and illogical paranoia regarding central banks. I am amazed how many new gold investors write me after getting nearly scared off by something they read on the Web regarding central bank gold sales. The truth is central banks are nothing more than fellow gold traders, they cannot control the gold market, and any anti-gold schemes they hatch will ultimately lead to a bigger and stronger gold bull.

Of the roughly 150k metric tonnes of gold thought to have been mined in all of world history, today central banks only control about 20%, 30k tonnes. Since central banks rightfully consider gold to be a threat to their dishonest fiat-currency regimes, investors sometimes fear central bank intervention in gold. Not surprisingly though since they are run by bureaucrats, central banks are probably the worst institutional gold traders on the planet.

One of the most foolproof indicators that a secular gold bear is ending or a secular gold bull is getting underway is central bank sales. Like the Bank of England's 2001 fiasco of dumping gold at a multi-decade bottom, for some reason central banks tend to sell at exactly the wrong time. Central bankers, amazingly enough, are human too and subject to the same greed and fear as all traders. It is only at the end of long demoralizing bears when they start believing the Keynesian propaganda claiming that gold is a barbaric relic and think about selling.

And when they do sell, their gold sales are always very temporary in impact. The only way to control a global price is to put a gun to the head of every single buyer and seller on the planet of that particular commodity. 120k tonnes of gold, or 80% of world supplies, are not controlled by the central bankers. We investors buying and selling this vast majority of non-official gold ultimately determine world prices through our own supply and demand. The central bank tail can't wag the bull for long!

Betting against central banks on gold is a great contrarian play. In the early 2000s they were selling aggressively and remember what happened? Did gold plummet from $255 to $200? Nope! Instead it soared from $255 to $720 despite the sometimes aggressive central bank liquidations. Expecting central banks to seriously hinder a secular move is like expecting a bureaucracy to be efficient, a fool's bet. They are all talk with very little if any direct long-term influence on gold prices.

And just as central banks tend to sell at the bottoms, they tend to buy near the tops. We are already seeing more central bank buying and less selling of gold at this young stage in our gold bull, and these trends will only accelerate with the gold price. Thus the same central banks that sold gold in the early 2000s will be buying it back in the coming years at much higher prices, ultimately driving this bull higher than it could have gone without them.

Why would central banks buy back gold? Around the world they are diversifying out of the falling US dollar, which makes up the lion's share of their reserve holdings, and buying gold. In addition they find gold more attractive when its price is rising just like all investors. By the time this bull is on its last legs a decade from now, I would not be surprised if central banks in aggregate hold much more gold than they did in early 2001 when this bull began. Ultimately central bank buying is going to really help gold.

Central banks have always been involved in the gold markets and always will be. They are merely traders just like the rest of us. It is totally irrational for gold investors to fear central banks. We investors, holding 80% of the world's gold, have always controlled the balance of power and we always will. Rising global investment demand will easily overpower central bank selling anytime, as we have witnessed abundantly in recent years.

8. Free Market in Information. For all of history until 1995, large organizations like governments had a vast advantage over individual investors when it came to information. But since the World Wide Web started growing popular outside of academia in the mid-1990s, the inherent information asymmetry working against individuals has vanished. Today a cheap computer and broadband grants you information-gathering capabilities vastly superior to even those commanded by superpowers as recently as fifteen years ago.

Gold is the ultimate free-market asset and currency and thrives in eras when information flows the most freely. Today's Information Age is witnessing the greatest free-flow of information in all of world history, far beyond the wildest expectations of empires past. Thanks to the ease of learning about anything instantly from the comfort of your own home today, governments can only pull the wool over the eyes of their citizens who willingly choose to remain ignorant.

Today investors around the world can easily learn about monetary history, stock-market history, gold, the immoral stealth tax of inflation, and countless other crucial core topics essential to long-term wealth building. Thanks to the Internet governments no longer have a monopoly on financial truth. Investing in gold is the inevitable outcome of learning more about the treacherous history of markets and money, not to mention governments. The deeper you understand these topics, the more you will respect and want to own gold.

The dazzling Information Age is also facilitating the rebirth of private 100% gold-backed currencies, this time in the form of digital gold. Why store your transactional money in the form of rapidly inflating government fiat paper when it could be stored in digital gold and hence never losing purchasing power? As gold-backed digital currencies gain popularity, demand for physical gold to back them will continue to grow.

9. The Rise of Asia. With China destined to become the next superpower while the West wanes, the locus of global economic might is shifting to the Far East. Unlike Western cultures like us Americans who are brainwashed into thinking of gold as a barbaric relic, inferior to paper assets, Asian cultures still have strong affinities for physical gold. A great example is Indian families storing extra income from harvest each year in the form of intricate gold jewelry.

As Asian investors grow wealthier, their traditional love for gold will ultimately lead to huge amounts of capital shunted into physical gold as they diversify their investments. Asia's hard-working ethic will lead to greater general affluence, and its aggregate gold investment consumption will utterly dwarf that of the West. While an average (read non-contrarian) American investor may have less than 1% exposure to gold, an average Asian may want 10% or even 20%+ of his portfolio invested in physical gold.

Even if the average Asian remains poorer than the average American in an absolute sense for decades to come, the combined effect of many hundreds of millions of newly-liquid Asian investors buying small amounts of physical gold could be staggering. I suspect that if Western central banks are dumb enough to dump their entire 30k metric tonnes of gold in the years ahead, the awakening Asian giant will collectively swallow it all up without so much as a hiccup.

Asia is probably the single biggest gold investment demand story in world history. It should ultimately dwarf US equity and bond flight capital and could very well lead to the biggest gold boom the world has ever seen. The net impact on gold demand from half the world's population rapidly industrializing and building wealth cannot be overestimated. It will probably ultimately blow away all of our wildest expectations.

10. Technical Proof. The only sure way to understand true underlying supply and demand fundamentals is to observe price action over a secular period, at least several years. If global gold demand is really growing faster than global gold supply, then the gold price has to rise. There is simply no other economic alternative in a free market! And make no mistake, the gold market is free until every single buyer and seller on Earth can be physically coerced by a single entity.

This chart shows our awesome secular gold bull to date, the proof of the pudding. For about six years now, a secular time span, gold demand has exceeded gold supply driving up prices on balance. If it was the other way around, if supply, including central bank selling, exceeded demand, this would be a downward-sloping bear trend.

Gold has climbed higher in US dollar terms for six years in a row now, with annual percentage gains noted on the time axis. Bull to date the Ancient Metal of Kings is up 182% as of this past May. Gold's long-term support lines have held rock solid for its entire bull, running parallel with its strong upward-sloping 200-day moving average. Gold has carved seven major higher interim highs and seven major higher interim lows, an unmistakable secular-bull fingerprint.

This gorgeous secular gold bull chart would never have happened if gold demand was not growing faster than gold supply. Nor would it have happened if the periodic central bank selling since 1999 was anything more than a temporary nuisance. A multi-year secular trend is beyond argument, as it reflects persistently bullish underlying supply and demand fundamentals for gold.

Sunday, December 24, 2006

Payday or Mayday?

Just read an article from the New York Times - Wall Street Bonuses: So Much Money, So Few Ferraris

After a year of record profits, investment houses like Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers and Morgan Stanley are awarding bonuses as high as $60 million.

“We love hedge funds, they are our favorite people. They don’t feel like the money is real and they don’t mind spending it — they don’t mind going up by $500,000 or $1 million increments.”

“It was a terrible year. I am going to the movies with my bonus. By myself."
(Keyword: Terrible)
Sounds like a supply and demand issue. But "So much money". Ok, so you take home a bonus of $10 million dollars, 20... 54! What's the fun in everyone has a Ferrari?

As we've mentioned many times, one of the only things that's had a real bad year has been the Dollar. And by contrast we've seen an immense surge in prices for assets. Precious metals up over 20%, Real estate still very high in many places, commodities did phenomenally well. I think the only thing that is over valued is the Dollar.

What is a bubble again? "A boom in economic activity..." sounds about right. How about contrarian sentiment? Do you know anyone who would turn down a dollar? Alright, supply and demand. From what I can see the supply is mostly in the dollar and the demand is in... Ferraris!

In a day and age when the wealthiest are giving away most of their wealth, Mergers and Acquisitions are at record peaks, and Private equity is on a rampage, who you gonna trust?

Let's backtrack to the 1970s. If you were a 30 years old investment banker on Wall Street then you'd be about 65 years old now. So we now have a whole new wave of individuals who strive on three things. The Dollar, Volatility and Risk.

The Dollar that they've been so successfully pursuing has lost over 84% of its purchasing power if you ask the silver it was once backed by. In the 1920, an ounce of .999 Gold and a suit would each cost you about $20. Today you could buy yourself a heck of a nice suit with that same gold, worth about $620. As for the 20 bucks, it probably wouldn't buy you lunch.

Volatility, as the Street has come to know it is at all-time lows. It makes you wonder. With all those hundreds of trillions of dollars being circulated in derivatives and hedge funds, what small level of volatility would it take to throw so many right out of the sky like it did to say, Amaranth ? The Derivatives market is like a great round in a poker game. Everyone's high rolling with thousands of dollars on the table until its time to turn over your cards.

Risk. This is a word that we've all just completely disregarded. What is Risk? A quarter century ago avoiding risk meant not to lose money. Stocks, contracts even cash were all called risky. Hard assets were king. How much gold do you own? How much real estate? Do you have a full tank of gas?

In the 70 and early 80s people wanted security. "Not to lose money" was the name of the game. Today its how to "Get rich quick" or "Double your money over the next 12 months!".

Times have changed, but change is inevitable. What won't change? As Jim Rohn says "After summer comes winter and after day comes night. I tell you that isn't going to change".

My Dad said to me "People who are into buying gold and hard assets are usually those who survived a war or a depression". I say yes, but too bad there aren't enough of them around to tell the tale.

Saturday, December 23, 2006

A Meaningful Bedtime Story

Once was town. Town had lake. Town had men. Men loved fish. Fish loved lake. Town men would go fish in lake.

Came winter. Men got sad. No lake to fish, Wise man say no worry. I go to lake. I take sled and saw. I go cut hole in ice and fish. Many Men say no. Ice will break. Wise man say no worry. I look at ice and it can hold man sled and fish. Wise men fish. Soon many men come in winter to cut hole in ice and fish.

One day men hear crack on ice. Wise men say ice will break. Men say no. We look at ice and can hold many more sled and man. Crack only wind. Ice break and men get wet.

Sun come out. Ice become lake. Many men go fish.

Winter come. Men got sad. No lake to fish. Wise man tell story of hole in ice. Many men go to lake with saw and sled to go fish for many fish. Wise man say too many men ice will break. Men say No. Last ice break. This ice no break. Many men come and still ice no break.

Winter decide to stay long. Men become stupid. Start build house on ice. Say ice no break. Wise men say ice always break. Stupid many men build more house than man on lake of ice that no break.

One day men hear crack in ice. Wise men say ice break like did many time. Many stupid men say No. This ice no break. We look at ice like wise man and ice can hold many more men sled house and fish. This crack only wind. Many stupid men get wet. Wise men eat fish.

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

"Bubbles"

Amazing how the word has come to a meaning almost entirely distorted from what it's definition was in the first place. With this thought in mind I started out on my venture.

First stop...Webster's Dictionary. A bubble is defined as "A state of booming economic activity (as in a stock market) that often ends in a sudden collapse".

Next let's reminisce. When did we have a "Bubble"? South Sea Bubble was definitely a bubble. The real estate frenzy in Florida ending in 1926 was such a bubble that many didn't even have what to lose when stocks crashed 3 years later. Stock markets in the 20s, 50s and 90s - when analysts from all walks of life suddenly became "ticker gurus" - Bubble.

Then came the Real Estate Boom in the aftermath of the 2000 meltdown. Here's where I get hazy. Comes forth Steve Forbes in one editorial and says "A bubble isn't a bubble if everyone knows its a bubble". Hmm. I guess were now seeing the truth behind that statement.

Now, fast-track another few years and EVERYTHING is a bubble. We now have a commodities bubble, a gold bubble, another Dow bubble, a derivatives bubble, a China bubble, for heavens sake, we even have a deficit bubble!

It seems that in the eyes of the average-minded American anything that goes up and gets, even some, media attention "must be a bubble".

Let's look back at the initial definition. I juxtapose "A state of booming economic activity". Does anyone you have ever come in contact with see a "commodities bubble"?

Let's recap. No "The-only-mining-stock-you-ever-need-to-own" analysts, No cheerleaders on Forbes, CNBC and Marketwatch, many business sites don't even have gold or commodities listed. No billboards blaring out "Instant trades with your futures broker for a quarter the price", No friends boasting to your family how much money they made last week buying silver bullion and definitely nobody in the elevator would give a damn how much corn futures or pork bellies rose yesterday.

This is not bubble activity. It's actually quite the contrary. It's what people tend to do after seeing so many bubbles. Instead of educating themselves with the facts, they - as usual - insist on speculating away they're aimless lives convincing themselves that either a) they made their money and are eerily convinced that this is as high as we can possibly go (cutting their gains), or b) they missed the opportunity and have to convince themselves that there isn't much steam left on this ride (letting the losses run).

If you really want a simple "Bubbles Guide", I suggest go to your local library or bookstore. Look at the shelves. Top is bubbles, bottoms are probably worth reading. (Looking for Jim Roger's book, "Hot Commodities", I knew exactly where to find it. Commodities truly "get no respect").

So ladies and gentlemen, here's all I can say. "Go ahead. Believe what you will. Trust those - and those only - who tell you what to do and follow the blind-reasoning that you have so mischievously placed in your close-minded brain and continue listening to the news as if it will be the Magic-8 Ball of tomorrow."

Markets tell us one thing, and one thing only. What everyone was thinking yesterday. To know what they will do tomorrow, look no further than the simple fundamentals behind the economics that has governed money from the day man first picked up a commodity for barter.

In the late 90s people got up in the morning, called themselves "Investors" and bought companies with no earnings, let alone some that didn't even have sales. Today is no different. People choose to run day and night after a fiat currency run by a government that has given us more warnings than for the first-class passenger on the last flight to London.

This too may turn into a bubble, but at least I have much time and profits before then, as well as the satisfaction knowing that I won't the last idiot who buys waiting for the bigger idiot to arrive.

We all act the same, but as the sages of old love to put it "The wise do in the beginning, what Fools do in the end".

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Creating the "Money Vacuum"

The Daily Reckoning
Monday, December 18, 2006

D.C. builders have begun selling houses like Wal-Mart sells soap.

The Washington Post tells us that Mid-Atlantic Builders in Rockville are
offering buyers the "Lowest Price Guarantee." He'll adjust the sales
contract downward if the price falls between the time the customer signs
an agreement and 45 days before the settlement.

Doesn't sound like much protection to us...but we didn't read the fine
print.

"We've given up trying to sell that house we bought in Delray Beach," said
a source on Friday. "Of course, we could sell it if we wanted...but it
would mean giving it a steep discount. There are about ten houses for sale
on the same street."

It took years to build up the housing bubble in places like South Florida.
It will take years to let the air out. Houses aren't marked to market
immediately, like stocks or copper. It takes time for buyers and sellers
to adjust to new market conditions. At first, the buyers hesitate. Then,
the sellers dither. Then, when weakness becomes more obvious, a few buyers
come forward...hoping for a bargain in what they believe is a market still
on its way up.

The government and the realtors seem to believe it is, too. New numbers
purport to show that house prices are still rising. In July, house sales
fell 21%...but not according to the Commerce Department, which claims that
sale prices actually rose 0.3%. The NAR, meanwhile, said they went up
almost a full percentage point.

What gives?

Well, the figures probably don't take into account the incentives sellers
are now offering. And they surely don't take into account the huge number
of houses that are simply not selling because owners are unwilling to take
the loss. Why? Because they are still not convinced the slump will be deep
or long lasting. This delays the impending bubble burst...and keeps the
press reporting only the part of the reality everyone wants to see - the
part that says that, as of July, those who were able and willing to sell
were apparently still seeing slight gains.

Meanwhile, this chart tells another story - about homeowners' collapsing
equity. As long as the current trend continues, owners will own less of
their own homes every month. They will be less willing to sell at a
loss...but many will be more desperate to do so.

The "home ATM is not refilling as rapidly as it has in recent years," says
Paul Kasriel of Northern Trust. For the last few years, U.S. consumers
just walked across the living room to the invisible ATM machine in the
corner and 'took out' some of their growing home equity. Now that equity
is no longer growing at the rate it was - if at all - the ATM machine
doesn't work as well as it used to. Many are still 'taking out'
equity...but now it's coming out of what they have left after house prices
go down, not what they are gaining from a rising market.

Mortgage equity withdrawal (MEW) has faltered, to an annualized rate of
$214.2 billion in the third quarter of this year after peaking at $730.5
billion a year earlier. Of course, this means that consumers have less
money to spend. And less consumer spending should begin to pinch
sales...and profits.

Not that Wall Street even blinked. Last week, the Dow hit new records. Of
course, it's still down in real terms...investors might as well have put
their money in a sock over the last seven years. You'd think they'd get
tired of it. You'd think they'd notice what is happening to the consumer.
You'd think they'd wake up one of these days in a panic. But so far, no
one has.

Which is why we continue our Crash Alert.

When everybody is thinking the same thing, nobody is thinking. The VIX,
which measures investors' fears of a crash, is near record lows...while
stock indices, property, art, commodities, and just about everything else
are at record highs.

Nothing may crash ever again. Never. Nothing but blue skies and soft
landings from now on. Yes, dear reader, we could all live happily ever
after, forever and ever, Amen.

But when you are passing through an airport and you find crash insurance
offered at record low prices...why not buy some? Who knows, maybe your
spouse will get lucky.

Saturday, December 16, 2006

Quote of the Day
Wonderful lines to ponder.
"The trouble with waiting and seeing is that you can't only wait and see.
You also have to do something. You can't stop breathing. You can't stop
eating. And you can't stop investing. There is no such thing as suspended
animation when it comes to your money; no such place as nowhere in the
financial world. Every minute of every day...for every asset class...you
are either long or you are short. Either you own it, or you don't own it.
Of course, you can be leveraged or unleveraged too...but that is merely a
measure of how bad the damage will be if you are wrong. If you don't own
Google, for example, you will lose potential earnings if it goes up. And
if it goes down, relative to the rest of the world - which includes Google
holders - you will be ahead of the game."

- The Daily Reckoning

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Quote of the Day

Modern Life
"A woman goes into a grocery storeand finds she can get tuna fish at half the price she paid a week ago. She is happy, and decides to take advantage of it by buying twice as much. She stocks up and gets twice as much for her money. Her husband, meanwhile, goes into his stock brokerage down the street. He finds the same stocks he bought a week ago now selling for twice as much. He too gets excited. He decides to stock up too...but only gets half as much stock for his money.Which one of them is doing the right thing?"
A True 50-50

I would have to say that the most amazing story this week wasn't in the financial news at all, although maybe it should be.

Senator Tim Johnson underwent successful surgery to relieve bleeding in his brain and treat a congenital malformation of his arteries. He is nevertheless in critical condition and so may Senate. The Democrats currently hold a 51-49 majority. In the case that Senator Johnson will not return, South Dakota Governor Mike Rounds, a Republican, may appoint a Republican replacement. The 50-50 vote would then be decided by Vice President Dick Cheney. (So he is necessary).

The fate of some of America's most important decisions may shift views overnight. I bet you nobody called this one.

Full Story from Bloomberg
Sentimental Analysis

I've decided to do some of my won research based on the general sentiment of the general public and the present time. I'm doing one poll a day for the next five days. Stay tuned for tomorrow's poll.

Todays Poll:
Where is the Best place to put your money over the next 10 years?
Results:
Cash 26%
Real Estate 23%
Stocks 22%
Bonds 9%
Gold 9%
Other 12%
*Other included: a casino, starting a business, commodities and diversified mutual funds.
Where would you put your money?

Ok, its late 1999. Uhu, everyone's going crazy as the Dow is setting new highs just about every day. You happened to have made a very substantial investment just after seeing ripe opportunity after the Crash of 87. You've used dollar-cost averaging throughout the years from your middle-class simple-but-adequate income. You hear the throngs of service reps in your office discussing the next big move for their favorite companies, postmen asking you how much you made that week and just about every analyst of planet earth crying out how if you don't have every penny you've ever owned invested in a company called Enron you're a poor unfortunate idiot.

You decide its time to get out. But what would you do with your millions. So you figure that real estate, although not doing half as well as stocks, could nevertheless earn you a very substantial amount in rent and then appreciate some well into your later years. It would make a great inheritance for your kids as well. After all "Real Estate is the safest investment" and you've always heard things like "Lesser return, but lesser risk".

What was faulty with this logic? Absolutely nothing. As a matter of fact you wouldn't have been the only one. Looking at a chart of Real Estate prices, inflation-adjusted, over the past 116 years.

As a matter of fact prices were just about average then. To your luck many investors who wanted out were thinking along those exact lines. Thus created an unbelievable surge in prices the nation over. Many cities had their average home increasing more than two-fold the initial investment.

But like anything, even the greatest asset can be ruined by overpricing. As soon as all the neighbors from next door are doing the same, its probably run its course. After all if everyone has made so much buying in, who is left to buy from the buyers?

There's valid reasons why all the wealthiest individuals in history have claimed that it is very easy to make money. Keeping it is rather difficult. But now, those who made their money in the steaming housing market and got out just as Mr. and rs. Smith were getting in, now need somewhere else to park their cash.

Commodities and hard assets. We've already seen a surge in various commodities such as corn, sugar and wheat, as well as in almost all metals, both base and precious. However, many are saying that the "Bubble" in commodities and gold is over.

Really? Do you see every Tom, Dick and Harry discussing their bullion purchases or parents setting up trust funds in sectors of agriculture and farming? Has Trillions been pumped into the commodities sectors that have been pushed so high by so many that they have so little up-room.

I would say quite the contrary, those claiming that this bull has run its course and is tired are the speculators who didn't get in on time and are convincing themselves its over. Name me people who got into metals in the 90s and ask them if their selling. They'd say "No way"! Jim Rogers who is probably the most bullish on commodities says that this bull still has 10-12 years to go even if it wanted to come in last for the shortest in history. Of course a fair amount of speculators could change all that.

So keep an eye out, because in a couple of years Blue Chips and Tech stocks may look extremely undervalued.

Monday, December 11, 2006

That's what I was waiting for...
The most recent numbers from LowRisk.com

56% bullish
, 28% previous week
23% bearish, 53% previous week
21% neutral, 19% previous week

Its clear that a top is moving into place. As last weeks bears moved over to bulls, I think this is the beginning of a downtrend.

Nevertheless, looking through historical records it seems that bear markets usually move in a two-steps-back one-step-forward movement. In this case we may see a bit more of a thrust from the buyers, maybe pushing the percentage to 58 or even into the 60s which would definitely signal a very bullish high like we saw in the late 90s.

Sunday, December 10, 2006

Dow Deja Vu?

I wish I was able to find a decent chart showing this properly. I'll just explain it in writing.

I was looking at a chart from Crestmontresearch.com from the years 1965 - 1981, more particularly the last Bear market. In that period stocks clung strong to 875 points. Although varying on and off it wouldn't break free of 1000 until the mid-80s.

What I saw was truly incredible. In the year 1965 the Dow hit an all-time high of 1000 (similar to the tech boom in the late 90s). It then shed off about 25% over the next four years to 640 in 1969, (again similar to the Dow dropping toward the 7250 line). It then staged an amazing recovery to pass its previous highs to a new high of 1050 in 1972, (I see you're with me). During this time volatility was at an all-time low and it held a P/E ratio of 15.

What happened next? The Dow then plummeted 460 points (more than 40%) over the next two years. To date the Dow has more or less mimicked this trend extending the peak-to-trough about 1 year, as well as the trough-to-peak another year.
Why the Hype?

"What wise men do in the beginning, idiots do at the end"

Hard Assets
As you can see I've been posting many articles about gold, precious metals and commodities. The simple reasoning behind it, is that we are now heading into a recessionary stage, where most people begin pulling out of equities and paper-IOUs and transfer over to hard assets. We have already seen a huge move of this sort from the Stock Market boom of the late 90s into the Real Estate sector, but no doubt this has too become speculative, appreciating the average price of a home by over 50%.

I asked myself however, while housing has already begun its decline, what makes it any less speculative than say commodities or precious metals that have seen a phenomenal increase in price over the past few years.

But when thinking it over a bit, I realized that the buying of a home and the purchase of gold, silver or platinum bullion vary extremely. It is not what they bought but why they bought.

Why Real Estate
Real Estate is property, usually in the form of a home. Everyone needs a home. However homes are costly and are expensive to build. In addition the area in which a home is located will send up the price indefinitely, hence the famous buyers beware "Location, Location, Location!".

Financing a home can also be complicated. Very few people ever buy a home with cash. Many take on mortgages, loans and financing help with which to place a down payment and enough trust to the lender to mortgage the property.

In 2001, after the post-tech-boom recession the Federal Reserve made money and credit readily available for all those who needed it. Flushing the economy with liquidity and making loans and home equity financing easier to do.

Thus set stage for a wave of speculation in housing, inviting millions of developers, lenders and speculators alike into a house-flipping, easy-money making frenzy. Many, who for years were able only to rent, now leaped at the opportunity to begin the venture of buying their own home. This fueled the market giving off steam for an ever increasing tolerance to the risks of home owning.

As we mentioned however, houses are not bought for cash and could easily be returned to those who hold the deed of lien. When dealing with hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of real estate those who aren't in the "Know" can get severely hurt.

Why Precious Metals
Precious metals, such as Gold, silver and platinum on the other hand, are bought with entirely different intention. Although similar to the "Real estate is the safest investment" mantra often repeated, gold and silver are bought with real money and remain in the sole possession of the buyer.

Now remember that buying into a frenzy can be detrimental regardless of what asset class you're buying into, but think about it. Unemployment is at very low levels. This means that one can assume that the average American has a roof over their heads. This means that regardless of status everyone is paying something to someone to sleep. There is and always will be a demand for homes, albeit at different prices.

Metals and commodities follow the same suit but how many people have invested recently in assets such as corn, wheat, sugar, lumber or oil. More so we have come so accustomed to paying for these resources in cash that we often forget that the primary medium of wealth for centuries has been in gold and silver. It's only a 35 year old novelty to use cash, unbacked by any hard asset, in its stead.

This is what I mean when I say that people will turn to hard assets. Things that they can carry around with them, feel and touch. Not promises that they have to check quotes on every 20 minutes or worry about how they'll pay back thousands of dollars in mortgages over a lifetime loan.

The transition will be massive and it will take years. The last time we had a bull market in commodities it lasted 16 years from 1964 - 1980. In that time many commodities soared 10-15 times in value. Instead of how many shares Wall Street traded that day many will want to be in on how many bushels of soybeans were produced in the past month. Interest in Tech companies and the newest iPod will be replaced by Farms and farming tools to make agriculture more efficient.

But don't get me wrong. The same euphoric speculation and risk-tolerance we have seen in stocks and real estate will show up in time. So when you hear from the waiter at McDonalds about that new gold mine that just opened up or how they made a fortune in corn futures, time to get out!

Learning about commodities and how to trade can take time and effort. If you're interested simply go to the nearest bookstore (or any online retailers) and grab a book or two on the subject (You may have trouble finding some though, I found Jim Rogers book "Hot Commodities" alone on the bottom shelf!).

Until then, go to your local coin shop, buy a few coins and hold it through all the while. Remember, Buy what you know. (I know a guy who bought a gold sovereign with a hefty premium and later found out it only sells for spot price). You won't regret it!

Why Silver over Gold?

In my previous article I explained the fundamental reasons behind owning gold, and mentioned that silver has even more growth potential. Here's why:


What History Tells Us

When the time came to establish an independent American currency the founders were very careful to establish a gold/silver ratio that exactly dovetailed with the current market price. Thus, the Coinage Act of 1792 established the US dollar and defined it officially as a weight of both silver and gold. Specifically, it was defined as 371.25 grains of pure silver and/or 24.75 grains of pure gold. This was a ratio of 15:1. Anyone could bring silver or gold to the new Philadelphia Mint to be coined, and silver and gold were both legal tender at this 15 to 1 ratio. The basic silver coin was the silver dollar and the basic gold coin was the $10 Eagle.

Now I want to show you a fascinating chart. It is the history of the gold/silver ratio in terms of the US dollar, since its 1792 founding to today.

As you can see, from 1792 to the Civil War in 1861 the ratio looks roughly stable. But there was a wealth of problems with it that the chart does not show. Because in fact, this ratio might have reflected the market prices of both metals in 1792, but market values, as we all know, change. And change they did. In fact, from the late 1780s through the next 30 years, Mexican mines began to pour out huge amounts of silver. The result was that the market ratio fell.


It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what happened. Silver was actually cheaper relative to gold than the US government "said" it was. Gold was undervalued and gold coins began to disappear from the United States as silver coins from all over the world began to flood in, since the US government was obliged to buy them at a price 5% over what the world market price was. It was a great way to make a quick little profit, so much more because the European monetary system was changing to reflect the market values of their own times.


For instance, in 1803 Napoleon established the Bank of France to stabilize a franc that had been ruined by the paper money inflation of the Revolution of the 1790s. Reflecting the new market ratios, he set the ratio at 15.5:1. Then, in 1816, when the British went back on the gold standard after the wars with France ended at Waterloo in 1815, they reflected the market at that time and chose a 16:1 ratio. With America still on a 15:1 ratio, overvaluing silver relative to gold, by 1810 and for years after, the US was left with virtually no gold coins. These coins went instead to places which valued them more. Sharp speculators could buy gold officially in the US and sell it in London for a gross profit of 6.7%


To make matters worse for the Americans, Spanish silver coinage was allowed to circulate alongside US coinage. But the Spanish silver dollars contained from 2 to 5% more silver than the US ones did. So it paid to take the heavier Spanish dollars to the Mint, have them melted down, pocket the profit, and repeat the process. Very soon only American silver dollars were left in circulation.


That meant that after 1810 America's monetary system was in a mess. This was to prove ruinous in the War of 1812. Not enough silver and no gold circulated, so individual banks printed paper money to finance the war. This caused horrible inflation. Prices soared by an average of 50% during the war. Worse, after August, 1814 banks did not have to pay out gold or silver at all if people holding the paper money came to ask for it. This act exacerbated the inflation, which in turned caused mal-investments (as it always does). And this resulted in America's first Depression, the Panic of 1819. The month of August, 1814 was a terrible one for America. This was the month where an invading British army entered Washington DC and burned the White House and Congress to the ground.


But our story is the gold/silver ratio here. Monetary chaos and inflation continued through the 1820s, until Andrew Jackson (1829 -1837) decided to do something about it. The Coinage Act of 1834 changed the 15:1 ratio to 16:1, better reflecting market realities. (You can see this on the chart.) There was one problem with the way this was done. Instead of up-valuing silver they de-valued gold. The gold dollar was devalued by 6.26%. The silver dollar was left as it was. This was a populist move: the cry went around the land to "leave the dollar of our fathers" alone. It would have been better to re-value silver upwards rather than gold downwards. This 1834 devaluation of the gold dollar set a bad precedent that would come back to haunt America exactly 100 years later. But things went well and for the first time since the 1790s, America had plenty of gold and silver coins circulating.


But then came 1848. Gold was discovered in California in huge amounts. A few years later, gold

was discovered in Victoria, Australia and Russia. All this new gold coming in cheapened it in terms of silver. The gold/silver ratio declined from 15.97 in January 1849, when the first '49ers arrived in San Francisco, to an average of 15.37:1 from 1853 to 1860, but this caused a problem. Silver left the US and with no small change and only larger value gold coins available, lots of new paper money was issued by banks in smaller denominations.


This near-constant headache was starting to tire Americans. Either gold had disappeared, or silver had, or sometimes both had. There had to be a better way. The days of the official bi-metallic standard in the US were numbered. A choice had to be made to either monetize one metal or the other. The one not made the official money would still circulate by weight. The wealthy and powerful wanted a pure gold standard, with the dollar defined in gold alone, with smaller silver coinage freely circulating by weight.


The Civil War intervened, giving America more to worry about than coin shortages. But a few years after the war, the "gold lobby" struck.


You see on the chart how after 1872 the ratio starts to soar out of the 14-16:1 range. In 1872 it became apparent to a few smart investors and even some wise officials in the US Treasury that the ratio, which had held steady at about 15.5 to 1 since 1861, was about to change drastically. Silver was about to lose much of its value.


One reason was the discovery of huge silver mines in Nevada, recently admitted to the Union with the motto, then as now, as The Silver State. New techniques were enabling miners to get more silver out than ever before.


But savvy globally minded men saw what was going on in Europe. Briefly, silver was being dethroned as money. First, starting in 1865 the world broke up into two factions. One wanted to continue bi-metallism as before. The leaders of this group were the US and France. France formed the Latin Union with Belgium, Switzerland, Italy and Greece to have a common ratio of 15.5:1. Further, the coins of one were to be accepted by all. But the other faction, led by Britain, wanted to do away forever with official ratios and go straight to the gold standard, with the national currencies defined only in terms of gold. Newly unified Germany joined them, as did Russia, Holland and Scandinavia. As 1873 opened, it was clear to smart people that the Latin Union was having problems.


Silver is Dethroned: The Ratio Soars

Taking advantage of this, the gold lobby passed a law in February 1873. It discontinued the minting of any more silver dollars. A year later, another law revoked the legal tender status of any silver coin above $5. Silver was effectively demonetized in America.


The market timing was perfect, because it was in 1874 that the ratio rose above 16:1 for the first time. Silver was pouring out of the mines, and Europe was increasingly moving away from silver as official money, so they needed less of it.


The ratio now began to soar and reached an amazing 42:1 by 1900. By that time the only major countries that held to the silver standard were Mexico, which produced the most of it, and China which had long historical ties to it. Mexican silver was particularly prized in Northern China, and it made up the bulk of circulating money throughout the country. Many attempts were made to get both countries off silver and onto gold, but they failed. One in particular was made in 1903, where the Americans tried to get the Europeans to join them in buying up massive amounts of Mexican silver in an attempt to make the Chinese currency rise too much in value. The Europeans were not happy at this attempt to subsidize US exports to China. Further, they coveted the Chinese markets for themselves and wanted to stay on good terms with the Chinese government. (It all sounds like what is going on a century later.)


This failing, the US went after Mexico. They got the Mexicans to pass the Currency Reform Act of 1905, which effectively made gold coins cheaper than silver ones, and thus undervalued silver, which fled the country and stopped being produced as much. This left Mexico with a gold coin standard.


So that left China as the only major power on the silver standard. And it almost caused a war. The Western powers invaded China to put down the Boxer Rebellion in 1900. They then foisted on the defeated Chinese a bill of $333 million. The Chinese started to pay this back in cheaper silver, and this enraged Britain, Japan and the US. The Chinese saw that a switch from silver to gold would only harm their economy. They defied the West and had their own Currency Reform in 1905, which replaced the old Mexican silver no longer coming out with their own silver currency, the tael. This is a measure of silver still in use in China. In Shanghai the new Silver Exchange will trade in taels, which is 50 grams of silver. And if China ever embraces silver money again, as it might, this could be the name of the currency.


So you see how seemingly far removed history has a real bearing on today's world. But back to the gold/silver ratio, look at the chart after 1900 and you see an odd thing. Each time the ratio rises it always is followed by a decline, however short, back to the traditional ratio area.


From 42:1 in 1920 it plunged to 16:1 a few years later. It briefly soared to nearly 100:1 in 1942, as gold was overvalued at $35 per ounce during this time. Silver then began to gain in relative value again in a long wave. It is interesting that 1942 marks the start of a huge bull market in the relative value of silver to gold.


For silver, the fall in the ratio from near 100 ended when silver briefly touched nearly $50 an ounce, and gold was around $850. The actual low came on January 31, 1980, when the ratio was 14.82:1. I want to point out that this 14.82:1 ratio came at the peak of the last silver bull market. It follows the pattern in having the ratio go back to the traditional area of 14 to 16:1. (Soon after, silver began a huge bear market relative to gold, which would take it up as high as 100:1 in 1991).


Certainly you can see by the chart that the ratio has been swinging back toward silver's favor since then. It has risen much faster than gold for years now. As I write this the ratio is 51.10. It thus matches the sharp rise in silver's value relative to gold that we saw in the few years after 1942. Then as now the ratio fell to about this current level and then started to fall more slowly over the next 30 years until the big blowout in 1980, when, again, we saw the ratio as low as 14.82:1.


I think we will see this area reached again. Whether it is 14.82, or 15 or 16, I think that silver will continue to rise faster than gold and the ratio will end up, even briefly, back in this traditional area.

So if we take a more conservative 16:1 ratio, and if gold reaches a high of $3,000 during this bull cycle, this means $187.50 silver. Of course, this is just a guess at this point. Who knows where gold will end up by the time this bull market is over? It could be $4,000, in which case a 16:1 ratio would be $250 silver.


It's all rather pie-in-the-sky now. I'm content to watch and wait and see where this bull market will take both metals.